Comments on: Darwin’s children?

By: The Reverse St Anselm Manoeuvre « That, Which

The Reverse St Anselm Manoeuvre « That, Which — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:17:56 +0000

[...] a view with which Kroto takes issue. (I discussed my views on the original story previously: here, here and [...]

By: Benjamin Carnys

Benjamin Carnys — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:52:15 +0000

Thanks, Tony. I hadn’t seen that; looks like there’s a lot to think about in Kroto’s piece.

By: Tony Sidaway

Tony Sidaway — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:21:14 +0000

Kroto has written a new piece for the Guardian about his views on Reiss's appointment.

By: ‘Natural selection’ « That, Which

‘Natural selection’ « That, Which — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:03:41 +0000

[...] Media, Science | Tags: bbc, creationism, michael reiss, robert winston, royal society, science | The damage was done. The BBC now reports that Michael Reiss has resigned as director of education for the Royal [...]

By: Addendum: Darwin’s children? « That, Which

Addendum: Darwin’s children? « That, Which — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 21:38:21 +0000

[...] has a Short Sharp Science blog post by online news editor Rowan Hooper that is a perfect example of the irrational, knee-jerk response to the comments of Professor Michael [...]