<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Natural selection&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carnys.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/natural-selection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carnys.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/natural-selection/</link>
	<description>There is no genre for the human spirit.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:06:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Reverse St Anselm Manoeuvre &#171; That, Which</title>
		<link>http://carnys.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/natural-selection/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reverse St Anselm Manoeuvre &#171; That, Which</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carnys.wordpress.com/?p=146#comment-158</guid>
		<description>[...] Thanks to Tony Sidaway for pointing out Nobel Prize-winner Harry Kroto&#8217;s comment in the Guardian, in which he takes the opportunity to respond to the swinging pendulum of public opinion. The majority view now appears to be that Michael Reiss was unfairly (and even foolishly) pushed from his post as Director of Science Education at the Royal Society, a view with which Kroto takes issue. (I discussed my views on the original story previously: here, here and here.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thanks to Tony Sidaway for pointing out Nobel Prize-winner Harry Kroto&#8217;s comment in the Guardian, in which he takes the opportunity to respond to the swinging pendulum of public opinion. The majority view now appears to be that Michael Reiss was unfairly (and even foolishly) pushed from his post as Director of Science Education at the Royal Society, a view with which Kroto takes issue. (I discussed my views on the original story previously: here, here and here.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
